<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Pam Slim - Tag - In a past life…</title>
        <link>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/tags/pam-slim/</link>
        <description>Pam Slim - Tag - In a past life…</description>
        <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:30:23 &#43;0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://archive.jtimothyking.com/tags/pam-slim/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
    <title>A Child of a Single Mom</title>
    <link>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2014/04/22/a-child-of-a-single-mom/</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:30:23 &#43;0000</pubDate>
    <author>J. Timothy King</author>
    <guid>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2014/04/22/a-child-of-a-single-mom/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<figure class="alignright size-medium"><a class="lightgallery" href="/2014/04/22/a-child-of-a-single-mom/smiley-mom-and-daughter-on-grass-Wirawat-Lian-udom-rotated.jpg" title="Smiley mom and daughter on grass; photo by Wirawat Lian-udom" data-thumbnail="/2014/04/22/a-child-of-a-single-mom/smiley-mom-and-daughter-on-grass-Wirawat-Lian-udom-rotated.jpg">
        
    </a></figure>
<p>(No post yesterday, because I was still on Easter vacation. So I thought now might be a good time to start sifting through the backlog of cool quotes I&rsquo;ve been collecting.)</p>
<p>We often perceive single-parent families as abnormal, dysfunctional, deficient, dirty, indecent, cursed, doomed to failure. But it doesn&rsquo;t have to be that way.</p>]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>What Chocolate Says About Entrepreneurship</title>
    <link>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2006/12/31/what-chocolate-says-about-entrepreneurship/</link>
    <pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:15:09 &#43;0000</pubDate>
    <author>J. Timothy King</author>
    <guid>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2006/12/31/what-chocolate-says-about-entrepreneurship/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>&ldquo;Once upon a time, there was a quiet, little village in the French countryside whose people believed in <em>tranquilite</em>. If you lived in this village, you understood what was expected of you. You knew your place in the scheme of things. And if you happened to forget, someone would help remind you. In this village, if you saw something you weren&rsquo;t supposed to see, you learned to look the other way. If by chance  your hopes had been disappointed, you learned never to ask for more. So, through good times and bad, famine and feast, the villagers held fast to their traditions. Until one winter day, a sly wind blew in from the north&hellip;&rdquo;</p>
<p>This past week I rented one of the best films of the last decade. It&rsquo;s not a film I usually would have watched. Despite its awards and nominations, the movie got a mediocre rating on IMDB. And there was nothing I read to make me think I would find it any different. But I remembered some old friends talking about it years ago, about how in the movie they put ground chili pepper in hot chocolate. (Tastes good, by the way.) And then I learned that this was how the Mayans used to make it. And I love chocolate, and I love chilies, and history intrigues me. And I figured, &ldquo;What the hey?&rdquo; But I was unaware of what I was getting myself into. This is one of those films you have to watch over and over again, each time gaining some new insight. Most surprising, and most painful, and most inspiring, as I watched the film, I found myself identifying more and more with Vianne, the main character, in a way I never expected.</p>]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>Yes, I&#39;ve Left Normal</title>
    <link>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2006/11/11/yes-ive-left-normal/</link>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:59:40 &#43;0000</pubDate>
    <author>J. Timothy King</author>
    <guid>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2006/11/11/yes-ive-left-normal/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>I gave my notice this week, and I&rsquo;m now officially self-employed (almost).</p>
<p>My first reaction was, &ldquo;How cool is this? I&rsquo;m rockin&rsquo; now!&rdquo;</p>
<p>My second reaction was, &ldquo;Oh s***! What have I just done?!&rdquo;</p>]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>Quick and Dirty May Be Dirty, But Is It Quick?</title>
    <link>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2006/10/09/quick-and-dirty-may-be-dirty-but-is-it-quick/</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 22:18:16 &#43;0000</pubDate>
    <author>J. Timothy King</author>
    <guid>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2006/10/09/quick-and-dirty-may-be-dirty-but-is-it-quick/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>I&rsquo;ve been meaning for some time to write about how slow &ldquo;quick and dirty&rdquo; is, how misnamed the term is, how misguided are the hoards of managers (many of them former <em>and current</em> software developers) who embrace &ldquo;quick and dirty&rdquo; as a fast solution to pressing problems, as though it could ever deliver an actual solution.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;ve been meaning for some time to write this. It took <a href="http://blog.qualityaspect.com/2006/10/09/quick-and-dirty-inc/">Lidor Wyssocky&rsquo;s latest blog post</a> to push me into it. And just in case someone out there couldn&rsquo;t tell you were joking&hellip; (You <em>were</em> joking, right?) The sad truth is that &ldquo;quick and dirty&rdquo; may be dirty, but it&rsquo;s never quick, at least not if you actually want to deliver a usable product.</p>]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
