<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Rejection - Tag - In a past life…</title>
        <link>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/tags/rejection/</link>
        <description>Rejection - Tag - In a past life…</description>
        <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:25:58 &#43;0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://archive.jtimothyking.com/tags/rejection/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
    <title>Rejection Sucks</title>
    <link>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2011/03/07/rejection-sucks/</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:25:58 &#43;0000</pubDate>
    <author>J. Timothy King</author>
    <guid>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2011/03/07/rejection-sucks/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>This morning, I replied to Sarah Allen&rsquo;s latest post, about how very many editors have been <a href="http://fromsarahwithjoy.blogspot.com/2011/03/rejection-sucks-and-late.html">rejecting her stories</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I have been telling myself for years now that I&rsquo;m good at rejection and that I&rsquo;ve learned to take it like water off a ducks back, and I think relatively I probably do handle it okay, but my rejection/acceptance ratio is really starting to make me feel like a hack&hellip;</p>
<p>But the thing is, how do you really know you aren&rsquo;t just lousy? I&rsquo;m serious when I ask that question. Sure your family and roommates will say it&rsquo;s good, but how do you know editors aren&rsquo;t laughing at your short story and using it to line their garbage cans? Again, serious question. What&rsquo;s the check? Is it the number of rejections?</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>The Myth of the Thick-Skinned Novelist</title>
    <link>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2010/05/19/the-myth-of-the-thick-skinned-novelist/</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 18:00:18 &#43;0000</pubDate>
    <author>J. Timothy King</author>
    <guid>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2010/05/19/the-myth-of-the-thick-skinned-novelist/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin: 0 0 1em 1em"><figure class="alignright size-medium"><a class="lightgallery" href="/2010/05/19/the-myth-of-the-thick-skinned-novelist/Little-Wonder-Woman-Nathan-Rupert.jpg" title="Little Wonder Woman" data-thumbnail="/2010/05/19/the-myth-of-the-thick-skinned-novelist/Little-Wonder-Woman-Nathan-Rupert.jpg" data-sub-html="<h2>Photo © 2009 Nathan Rupert CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 (source)</h2><p>Little Wonder Woman</p>">
        
    </a><figcaption class="image-caption">Photo © 2009 Nathan Rupert CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nathaninsandiego/3756363424/">(source)</a></figcaption></figure></div>
<p>Some years ago, when I was a fledgling storyteller still puzzling through the basics of what makes a story work (or not), I frequented a certain writer&rsquo;s forum, now defunct. One of the writers there made it very clear that when we critiqued his work, we should be positively nasty about it. He didn&rsquo;t want to hear anything soft and fluffy about how well he wrote, because otherwise how could he grow as a writer? Rather, he wanted to hear about all the stuff he did wrong. That&rsquo;s what we call &ldquo;having a thick skin.&rdquo;</p>
<p>This is a common enough view in critique groups, although I don&rsquo;t share it. I think that positive criticism can be even more useful than negative, as long as it&rsquo;s constructive. That is, if you tell the writer what she did that particularly worked (rather than what didn&rsquo;t work), you&rsquo;ll be supporting her in her strengths. That&rsquo;s even more important than helping her overcome her weaknesses, because we all have areas in which we&rsquo;re weak. But a writer makes her name on her strengths, not her weaknesses, because her fans read her work in order to experience those strengths.</p>
<p>That&rsquo;s a writer&rsquo;s critique group. But you really don&rsquo;t know how criticism feels until you get your first unfair review— that reviewer who doesn&rsquo;t just dislike your story, but dislikes you personally. He doesn&rsquo;t just disagree with what you&rsquo;ve written, but rather thinks you yourself are a charlatan. And he may not have even read your book. Every author has gotten such a review at least once, and as soon as you do, you can say you&rsquo;ve arrived. <em>That&rsquo;s</em> when a thick skin really comes in handy.</p>
<p>Despite the thick skin, it gets easier to be criticized as much as it gets easier to be turned down for a date. In other words, it doesn&rsquo;t get easier. You just get used to it— maybe.</p>
<p>Or more likely, you don&rsquo;t.</p>]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>A Penchant for Cotton</title>
    <link>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2009/05/12/a-penchant-for-cotton/</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 12:00:44 &#43;0000</pubDate>
    <author>J. Timothy King</author>
    <guid>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2009/05/12/a-penchant-for-cotton/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>She approaches me during my lunch hour in the park, wearing a white, cotton T-shirt, along with blue shorts and sneakers. She has propped her smooth, right leg on a bench near where I am sitting and is tying her shoe. My eyes fix, unable to move from their stare.</p>
<p>My first crush wore cotton T-shirts, soft and warm, like a woman. I accidentally bumped into her one day while filing into Algebra class. My arm rubbed against her back, feeling her bra clasp through the thin, white fabric. My entire body involuntarily froze for several seconds. I remember feeling as though I had just touched something sacred, maybe defiled it, like Moses at the burning bush or Isaiah in the temple.</p>]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
