<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Spelling - Tag - In a past life…</title>
        <link>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/tags/spelling/</link>
        <description>Spelling - Tag - In a past life…</description>
        <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:00:12 &#43;0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://archive.jtimothyking.com/tags/spelling/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
    <title>Pet Peeves: Loose Instead of Lose</title>
    <link>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2006/04/21/pet-peeves-loose-instead-of-lose/</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:00:12 &#43;0000</pubDate>
    <author>J. Timothy King</author>
    <guid>https://archive.jtimothyking.com/2006/04/21/pet-peeves-loose-instead-of-lose/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>I have a long list of pet peeves, some that bug me more than others. One that I see popping up more and more is that people spell <em>lose</em> with two <em>o</em>&rsquo;s. Lately, I&rsquo;ve taken to passing over even potentially interesting articles that have this misspelling, such as this recent one: <a href="http://www.sbishere.com/inventors-entrepreneurs/">&ldquo;How inventors and entrepreneurs loose touch with reality.&quot;</a></p>]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
